jump to navigation

Handling criticism and dealing with trolls May 21, 2007

Posted by JamesVinzer in Blogging Ethics, Internet, Social Engineering, blogging.
1 comment so far

A few months ago, I posted an article on a website which I will admit wasn’t my best work, and a few people stated that, but then I got a little fucktard of a poster who decided to remain anonymous who said this:

Your profile says “freelance writer”. If by “freelance” you mean shitty and by “writer” you mean blogger, it all makes sense.

Shit like this is not cool, especially when you decide to cowardly hide under the shield of anonymity to deliver something like this. Yes, it may have sucked, but it DID NOT DESERVE someone mouthing off to me like that. You could argue that it is criticism, but it was criticism that was designed to hurt, rather then help.

People who do this will not fare well in the blogosphere. Nobody wants to deal with an asshole on their blog OR site. Even if you’re anonymous, your IP is still present, and one day, you’ll find yourself with a Forbidden error on your browser.

Bottom line: Don’t be an ass. We’re not here to let you say whatver you want to us.

Now, with that in mind, how to deal with idiots like this? Well, if it’s your blog, delete the offending criticism without a big show, unless the person has already created a comment war in the post. Then you say why the head comment got deleted later on.

If the person has a registered nick on your blog, and is a repeat offender, then you have more options. First, if it’s your blog, warn the person, and if they do it again, ban them. Second, if you’re on a service like wordpress.com, notify the admins about the troublemaker.

If it gets to the point where the person is consistently making new names or is constantly a bother, ban their IP. This also works when the person is “anonymous.” If the situation persists, or they start attacking you on AIM/Email, etc, write down everything they send you, and notify the authorities you are being harrased.

Whatever you do, try not to take any direct action by yourself that might be bad later on (i.e, no hacking, DoS attacks, etc.) You could land yourself in some serious trouble. Handle trolls as quick as possible.

Have you had trouble on your site? How did you deal with it?

Using your blog as a resume? May 20, 2007

Posted by JamesVinzer in Blog Style, Professional Blogging, blogging, business, freelancing.
1 comment so far

I just posted this comment on a Lifehacker post regarding how the blog is becoming the new resume. Sorry to be pasting most of my comment from there, but this is pretty much my opinion on the matter.

What do you garner from a blog? If you only have a LiveJournal, that won’t look professional at all. I don’t have the money to get my own domain name yet, so I know I’ll look less on that part compared to somebody with their own name.

Also, how do you include your work experience? Your projects? It doesn’t really explain this. Now, I can see a blog working alongside the rest of your resume, but I just don’t see the blog AS your resume, unless you’re applying to a blogging job.

Yes, a blog can work for you when applying for a job, but if I was an employer, if you just sent me a cover letter saying “Check out my blog” without a resume (Unless your resume was in the blog) then I’d delete your email and laugh for hours.

Bottom line: Your blog is not your resume. Continue using it!

Typing: The faster you are, the more you can blog May 19, 2007

Posted by JamesVinzer in Blog Style, Blog structure, Writing, blogging.
1 comment so far

Often, we forget that simply things such as how fast/accurate one can type can make all the difference in a deadline or a turnaround. It also allows you to type those blogs faster, and your reports quicker. Hell, impress your friends with your speed.

There’s a number of ways you can improve your typing. One way is to purchase software. The most popular is called Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing. It does exactly what it says it does. It’s a woman named Mavis Beacon…well…teaching you how to type.

What’s that? You’re a broke freelancer like me? No worries! Craig Childs of Lifehack.org writes about a program that’s free that teaches you how to type:

I generally accredit my ability to type on a computer to those days on ICQ during highschool.

A better, more structured, approach would be something like this online typing tutor. TypeOnline.co.uk is a simple site that offers a series of lessons for keyboard accuracy, speed and other related exercises.

While not as full-featured as Mavis Beacon, this program will definitely help you to be a better typist. I personally can type 70 wpm. What about you?

Learn to type online (Via www.lifehack.org)

The power of a morning ritual May 18, 2007

Posted by JamesVinzer in Writing, articles, blogging, freelancing.
add a comment

From Freelanceswitch.com Leo writes about the benefits of creating a morning ritual for one’s blogging. This actually is something I would approve of as well, because I’m trying it out as well. Leo writes:

If you’re having trouble getting your writing done, try creating a morning writing ritual. You can get a lot more done each day, as an early boost of productivity will spur further productivity throughout the day.

Several of his reasons for this are useful, such as getting your most important task overwith, and the fact that routines help things get done. He also writes some tips about getting into this ritual:

Prepare the night before. When you first wake up, you’re not always thinking right. Prepare for your morning writing ritual when your thinking is clear, in the evening, and your morning will start off so much better. How can you prepare? Get your writing tool out and ready to go — whether that’s your word processor (Google Docs for me) with your document open and ready to go, or your favorite writing pad and pen, have it out and set up.

There’s plenty more tips that are definitely of use for the blogger to be.

Create a Morning Ritual – Freelanceswitch.com

A Code of Conduct for Bloggers? May 18, 2007

Posted by JamesVinzer in Blogging Ethics, Web 2.0, blogging.
1 comment so far

Last April, the folks at O’Reilly, who coined the concept of Web 2.0, declared that they want to create a code of conduct for Bloggers. I actually was talking about a concept of ethics in Blogology 101, so this is something I want to further my opinions on.

While there is nothing in the code concerning payolas or reviews, a good deal of the code is geared toward that sacred duty Google knows all to well: Do no evil. Also there are things such as Taking responsibility for your words, something I inferred but didn’t outright say with my Zune post. In addition, that one would never say anything on a blog they wouldn’t say in person. Wow, that takes out..well, pretty much every emo kid in LiveJournal. I would also like to say that I enjoy the fact that comment deletion is left solely to the blogger(s).

But there are other things I have problems with. One of those is Keeping the sources private. This was obviously added because of when Apple tried to sue a few bloggers to reveal their sources. I have a bit of experience in the journalistic world, and I’ve been told to cite sources whenever possible, but that anonymous sources are OK, so long as they can be confirmed.

Another problem that I have is with the rule of “Do no harm.” Rather vague, isn’t it? This is what the rule says according to the draft of the code:

A blogger must not use his or her blog to willfully cause harm. A blogger must consider the impact of his or her actions on others. A blogger must not send his or her audience to harass other bloggers or people.

Sounds good, but then again, what if a blogger discovers that people are going to be causing a problem, either writing something bad, spamming a forum, etc. Should they not attempt to do something to stop the problem? You could argue that it’s for the authorities to deal with, and I’ll agree. But I feel that as a blogger, your duty is to the Blogosphere first, and and code of conduct second. If someone has issued a libelous entry, or has otherwise commited a wrong, other bloggers and their audience should have the right to stand up.

Now, obviously, if a blogger decides to go on a harassment campaign simply because he hates the person, that’s stupid. You end up looking like a troll.

All in all, it’s pretty good for a start. If it’s made official, I might just adhere to it. Whether you do or not is up to you.

The Blogger’s Code of Conduct Draft.

Reviews for services: My opinion May 17, 2007

Posted by JamesVinzer in Internet, Reviewing, Social Engineering, blogging.
add a comment

In 2004, Google released its awesome mail Client: Gmail. OF course, Google made it invitation only, so thousands of users flocked to sites where they could receive an invite. Many even offered to pay people upwards of $200 for an invite to use Gmail, among other things. It was incredible, back in the day. Wouldn’t surprise me if a few souls were traded in the process.

Of course, being a young dashing eSheep, I wanted one too! Of course, I got directed to the back of the Gmail invite line. But, then I looked at a blog where someone was saying how they got a Gmail account on account of being a journalist for a blog, and I got an idea.

See, at the time I wrote for a website under a different name that was based on political opinions, but we could occasionally let a tech article slip by. Having written about Gmail before, I decided to email Google saying that I was a writer for this website, and I wanted to check out their email program, and in exchange, I would write a review for them.

A few days later, I got an invitation from Google’s PR department to use Gmail! It was probably the best thing that has ever happened to me in my time as a blogger/writer. Something that people were desperate to buy had been given to me by the Google Gods in exchange for 300 words.

So I wrote the article, emailed Google and told them thanks again. But now it brings an odd question up: Was I ethical in doing that? If I write a review for a service in exchange for a chance to use it, is it a violation of a blogger’s ethics? With sites like PayPerPost, where bloggers can be paid to review a service (Provided they state that they were paid to do so,) I wonder if what I did was OK.

I personally believe that I am offering a service to sites like Gmail when I do this. It’s a small sacrifice on both sides: They give me an account, I write a blog entry about it. They get a little publicity, and I get the chance to do an interesting program.

When the next big thing comes out, I’ll be sure to try to do it again. Whether you will or not is completely up to you. Also, I would like a little briefing on the ethics on doing this? Got an opinion? Hit the comments.

Finding your niche 2: Got too many niches? May 17, 2007

Posted by JamesVinzer in blogging, niche.
add a comment

In my last post regarding niches, I wrote that to be a successful blogger, you need a specialty. Well, let’s say you got a specialty…then another specialty…and another…you get the point.

Your problem is that you have so many things you want to write about, but so little time. There are indeed a few things you can do to help yourself out.

1. Try to combine your blog niche

One thing you can attempt to try is to find a way as to how your niches combine together. For instance, though I decided to keep mine separate, you could combine a blog based on the different things you freelance: Programming, writing, resumes, etc. The advantage to this is that you don’t have to do much to update your blog. Disadvantage: Your blog gets really cluttered.

2. Multiple blogs

The advantage to this is that your blogs remain separate, so you attract separate audiences if you want them. The disadvantage to this would be that you’ve got upwards of two, three or more blogs to update on a regular basis.

3. An all-in-one blog with tagging
This attempts to combine the best of 1 and 2. Basically, you would be blogging on your one blog, and tagging each for easier reference. This is advantageous when using something like WordPress, because you could create pages on your blog dedicated solely to those tagged entries. However, it’s bad because it’s more work for your reader to look at your content. Plus, it also makes your blog look like it’s confused about where its place in the Blogosphere is.

Again, all three options have their ads and disads. If you tried one of these things, how did it go? Do you have another suggestion? Please reply!

Choosing your niche March 26, 2007

Posted by JamesVinzer in Blog networks, Internet, blogging, headlines, structure, style, technique.
1 comment so far

One of the most important things you have to do when thinking of a good blog is to figure out what you believe is your blog’s specialty. If you try to hit everything, you will only get nothing but confusion from potential readers.

The question then remains: “What should I blog about?” For many, it’s a particular thing they enjoy. Salon.com has a segment known as “Ask the Pilot,” which is a blog written by an airline pilot. You can find theme blogs all over. I’ve found blogs on pugs, naval ships, even toilets.

It all boils down to what you want to talk about. Think well, and knock yourself out.

How to write a great blurb November 26, 2006

Posted by JamesVinzer in articles, blogging, structure, style, technique.
add a comment

A blurb is a mini-article. These articles are often used for describing new technologies, or gizmos, gadgets, etc.

These blurbs usually consists of one, and no more then two paragraphs. This means that you will need to summarize all of the information you desire in those two paragraphs, because anything more will lose the attention of the reader.

The two paragraphs can be broken into two separate areas. The first paragraph is directed at the audience of the blurb, and the second is a description of what is being blurbed. (Is that a word?)

For our example, I link you to a particularly good Gizmodo blurb. Note how Mark presents a reason why you would want to buy this thing: “For only $3, you can own a pocket spy camera that takes stills and movies, and can double as a webcam.” He’s trying to get you on the price of the camera, as well as the fact that it is easily pocketable.

In the second paragraph comes the specs, or the description of the camera. In here, you play the specifications that people will like. Here, people are wanting something that is small and will fit into their pockets. But Mark doesn’t discuss the history of the gadget in question, which if you check the comments of the site, doesn’t seem rather good. Now, I’m not saying you should outright lie about the description (You shouldn’t.) But you can present only the specs people will care about.

Lastly, especially for a cheap P.O.S like this, it’s good to include a little humor about the object. Just a little something to make the reader chuckle.

Blurbs are good for people who do things like reviewing small things such as software, devices, billboards and the like. The only things I’d recommend you stay away from are things like movies and restaurants. Those require a full-scale article for reviewing.

Happy Blurbing, and good Blogging!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Blogging Networks and You: How to define your network November 25, 2006

Posted by JamesVinzer in Blog networks, LinkedIn, Social networking, blogging, business, networking, networks.
3 comments

For the last quarter, I’ve been writing a paper on the applications of social network theory to sites like Myspace, and it got me thinking: For us to be popular, we need a network.

In this case, if you want more people to read your site, you need to develop a network of people. This network doesn’t have to be every stranger in the world. Rather, it could just simply be you telling your friends about your blog, and asking them to spread the blog around.

Another thing you can do is go to various websites that deal with your blog niche and and post on them. However, if you go this route, DO NOT JUST SIMPLY SPAM THE SITE WITH YOUR URL! Instead, leave a post in a controversial thread and say you have experience in this. My recommendation: Enter a blog entry about the controversy, then offer a brief interpretation of your entry on the forum with a full link. Easy hits, and you’ll look credible to the people on the site, which may mean more readers.

A third move you can make is to join a few social networking sites to play your name. While Myspace and Facebook are good, if you really want to play the professional game, I would suggest joining LinkedIn. LinkedIn is a professional level social networking website for people to link themselves to. On LinkedIn, you can market yourself and your blog, and point yourself to some more readers. You can also network with other bloggers, as well as your co-workers and friends. Heck, it might even land you a job with a company as a blogger!

The bigger your network is, the more potential readers you have. Even if it’s only your friends, it’s still better then nothing, right?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,